Who We Are

The Campaign for Primary Accountability is a non-partisan political action committee. Our goal is to bring true competition to our electoral process, to give voters real information about their choices, and to restore fair, not fixed, elections.

The Campaign for Primary Accountability makes independent expenditures to give voters the facts they need to make informed decisions and level the playing field for challengers in Congressional primary elections. We work in districts dominated by one party, where the winner of the primary will cruise to victory in the general election.

Incumbents usually have a “message monopoly” during primaries. They can raise more money, mostly from lobbyists and special interests, and have the institutional support of the party establishment. They use their advantages to discourage primary challengers and prevent multi-candidate elections from taking place.

The Campaign for Primary Accountability encourages challengers so voters will have a real choice in real elections.

In the 2012 election cycle, the Campaign for Primary Accountability motivated more voters to cast a ballot in their Congressional primary, and successfully helped several challengers in Democratic and Republican primaries replace entrenched incumbents. The challengers span the political spectrum and are bringing fresh blood and new ideas to Congress.

The Campaign for Primary Accountability is dedicated to increasing the number of competitive, multi-candidate primary elections so citizens can hold members of Congress accountable. We want to see a Congress that answers to the people on Main Street rather than the lobbyists on K Street.

Do you like this page?

Showing 2 reactions

commented 2013-12-26 13:40:21 -0600 · Flag
Thank you
commented 2013-12-21 20:28:09 -0600 · Flag
A new book on 9/11 is out.

Dimitri Khalezov has spent 10 years researching and writing this book. Download links:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x0pdmokX9s8

Or read at:
http://www.scribd.com/doc/170266922/9-11thology-The-third-truth-about-9-11-or-Defending-the-US-Government-which-has-only-the-first-two

In a 2010 interview, Khalezov explained that you can’t build a skyscraper in NYC without an approved demolition plan. On 9/11, the World Trade Center’s demolition plan was put into action to demolish the complex.

Khalezov learned of this demolition plan from his job in the Soviet Union. He had worked in the nuclear intelligence unit and under an agreement between the Soviet Union and the USA, each country was obliged to inform the other of peaceful uses of nuclear explosions. The WTC was built with 3 thermo-nuclear charges in its foundations.

Note: underground nuclear explosions do not produce mushroom clouds. This is only ever seen when the explosion takes place above ground. On 9/11, the explosions were deep underground.

More info:
http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/sociopolitica/esp_sociopol_911_154.htm

You can watch the 2010 interview at:
http://www.disclose.tv/forum/dimitri-khalezov-wtc-nuclear-demolition-full-playlist-t21675.html
Video # 4 – WTC’s demolition plan
Video # 14 – WTC 7 (which fell ½ hour AFTER the BBC announced its collapse).
Videos # 24/25 – chronic radiation sickness of WTC responders (their cancers are not due to asbestos poisoning)

Khalezov was interviewed on 4 Sept 2013:
http://www.renseradioarchives.com/harris/

I know it is preposterous to claim that the WTC was brought down by nukes. But if you look up the meaning of ‘Ground Zero’ in the old dictionaries you have at home, you’ll find that there would only be one definition. It is what you call a place that has been nuked.

After 9/11, the US government sent people round to every bookshop and public library on the planet to replace ALL the dictionaries. The replacements differed only in the meaning of ‘ground zero’. They show extra definitions for that term, to obfuscate the original single meaning.

For example, if you have a genuine old Merriam-Webster dictionary, you would see this:
ground zero n (1946) : the point directly above, below, or at which a nuclear explosion occurs.

The replacement books (even of old editions) show two extra definitions and this is what you’ll see:
ground zero n (1946) 1 : the point directly above, below, or at which a nuclear explosion occurs. 2: the center or origin of rapid, intense, or violent activity or change 3: the very beginning : SQUARE ONE

Have a look at this video:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mBQuoPi_grw
At 6:05 mins, he shows the old and new definitions of ‘Ground Zero’.
Sign in with Facebook, Twitter or email.